Wednesday, December 17, 2008

They'll only "negotiate" if they can raise taxes

Still no budget here in California and, to make matters worse, the Republicans have proposed a great budget, just like the governator had requested, and neither the Democrats nor the Governor are willing to accept it.

The way I see it, they don’t want to accept it because it would mean not taking more of our money through taxes or “fees”. They will be able to get $6.5 billion dollars just by redirecting funds that are currently not being used:

  • 2.1 billion would come from Prop 10 monies which are currently not being used. This money is directed for early childcare centers; I work in a funded center and I can tell you, we don’t need that money. Sure, some of it comes in handy; however there are times when we are buying junk that we don’t need because it’s there. Knowing that there is that much left over…that’s a lot of wasted money!

  • 3.9 billion would come from Prop 63 monies which are not being used. This money is directed for mental health issues. Now, I haven’t talked to anyone personally in this field, but from the reports I’ve read and heard, this money would be missed about as much as the Prop 10 money would be missed in the early childhood care centers.
  • 484 million would come from some fund transfers.

That’s it. There is no more money coming out of the tax payer’s pockets or hands. The Republicans are seeing exactly what the public is seeing: there already is more than enough money available to them and not enough for us.

So, how does that compare to what the Democrats and Governor want to do? Every one of their plans involves raising taxes in many forms:

  • (Democrats) 5.7 billion to increase the vehicle license “fee” (read tax) to 2% of the vehicle’s value. (Schwarzenegger) has a similar idea, but it would just be a flat $12 per vehicle to give a 451 million increase to revenue

  • (Democrats) 2.4 billion to increase the income tax and freezing the tax brackets rather than letting them adjust with inflation. Now, Schwarzenegger doesn’t want to increase the INCOME tax…no he has other plans (read on)

  • (Schwarzenegger) 9.1 billion sales tax increase by 1.5 cents for 3 years (cause of course they’ll drop it back down after 3 years and forget the fact that we have one of the highest sales tax in the country)

  • (Schwarzenegger) 1.4 billion sales tax on services not currently taxed (things like taking your pet to the vet, amusement parks, sporting events, and of course let’s hit those cars up again with a tax on vehicle repairs)

  • (Schwarzenegger) 1.2 billion for a 9.9% tax per barrel on oil extracted from California

  • (Schwarzenegger) and last but not least 829 million by raising excise tax on alcohol to 5 cents a drink

Of course, according to the Democrats they are willing to “negotiate”; to them this means that they will be willing to make SOME cuts if the Republicans would just agree to increasing taxes.

Let’s see, the Republicans are willing to cut 15.6 billion dollars from the budget, the Governator 9.3 billion, and a whopping 4.5 billion for the Democrats. Who really is serious about get our budget back in order?

Everyone is willing to cut spending on the schools: 10.6 billion from the Republicans, 4.5 billion for Democrats, and 3.2 billion for Schwarzenegger. From what I see, way more than all that combined gets WASTED in the schools every year.

At least Schwarzenegger and the Republicans are close to what should be cut in SSI/SSP. When looking at the Democrats, it seems they aren’t willing to cut more than 750 million for ANY program other than the schools.

The Republicans specifically say they want to cut 738 million from UC and CSU by increasing the student fee and eliminating in-state tuition for UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS! I seriously want to know HOW they can get in-state tuition if they aren’t legal residents here. Someone want to explain that to me anyway?

There is also an agreement from the Republicans and Schwarzenegger in cutting spending on transit grants. I am all for this considering how little the transit is used in this state anyway. Oh, the Democrats are willing to cut, but only 156 million.

My favorite, the Republicans actually have proposed a 5% pay cut to the legislation! They see that if they are cutting from everywhere else, they need to cut themselves as well. I admire that!

A message to the California Republicans: Keep up the amazing work, stay strong, we are all rooting for you!

Labels: ,

6 Comments:

Blogger Matthew Canonicus said...

I am sad I voted for Arnold. It was the biggest voting mistake I've made. I almost wish I could move back to California just so I could vote against that pro-choice RINO.

Seriously, Jennifer, I had no idea what was getting pulled with the California budget. I wonder how the democrats are motivating all these hikes.

Also, have you heard the things Bloomberg is doing in NY? (Paterson also)? The taxes are getting heavy, heavy increases and he fired a major portion of the city's cops. Sounds like it's going back to pre-Guilliani over there. How sad.

Thanks for the update.

December 17, 2008 10:26 PM  
Blogger Matthew Canonicus said...

Also: I dig the signature. I'm afraid all our posts look like the same person is doing them. I'll consider doing something like that for myself also.

December 17, 2008 10:28 PM  
Blogger Timothy said...

I don't really know the details of the situation so I won't make any judgements. However, do you think it's wise to judge how valuable money will be through anecdotal evidence? I can appreciate that you have worked in a funded centre, and have an inside perspective on the needs of the area you worked in, but all it really proves is that the specific one you worked in doesn't need the money. Maybe other places do? I'm not sure. Also all of that money going towards mental illness sounds like a really big deal since there is so much of it. Maybe the answer is in a compromise, where spending is cut marginally and taxes are raised marginally?

December 18, 2008 12:08 AM  
Blogger Jenni said...

Matthew, I was pressured into voting Arnold in, too. I wanted to vote for McClintock but everyone said it would have just "wasted a vote" and got the Democrat in. I wish we "vote wasters" had stuck together and voted him in. We definitley wouldn't be in this situation now.

(the signature can be created at mylivesignature.com and creates an html for you to use)

Timothy, I would say you are somewhat correct, however I haven't just worked at one agency in this and I have a great network in my field. The money is getting wasted and none of us can spend it fast enough. We seriously get too much money to spend with this prop at times.

And I know that there are key groups that pull at people's heartstrings and all a politician needs to do is use those words to get their agenda passed (children, mentally disabled). I have a hard time jumping to the conclusion to cut money from these programs too...that is until I really look into it and find all the money wasted or unneccesary.

December 18, 2008 6:12 AM  
Blogger Matthew Canonicus said...

Hmm ... maybe money is the source of this mental instability. Government sure likes to throw it around.

Even though this is more of a state issue, Rush has given it a lot of attention. You can read about his take here.

December 19, 2008 12:27 AM  
Blogger Nap Warden said...

I am just happy I'm not the only one with a messed up Governor:P

January 1, 2009 7:28 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home