Wednesday, November 12, 2008

The Invisible Hand


By preferring the support of domestic to that of foreign industry, he intends only his own security; and by directing that industry in such a manner as its produce may be of the greatest value, he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention.

Adam Smith. On the Nature and Cafes of the Wealth of Nations.


There are essentially two approaches to economics: the visible hand and the invisible hand.

The visible hand approach assumes that people are more productive when the motivations and effects of labor are visible. The invisible hand approach allows people to have any motivation they want.

The more visible handed the approach, the less freedom people have. Freedom is invisible, and it implies people's choices cannot be made by others. A visible hand approach leads to a large government or religious structure.

For example, in Soviet Russia, people couldn't choose to start or join a business. These determinations were all made by central planning. This presupposed that greed could be eliminated by making everything out in the open. This approach tends to focus on appearances (i.e. it's visibility).

In Adam Smith's invisible-hand approach, people are free to do anything economically ... which assumes that if there is a duty, it is an invisible duty and something that each person must come to terms with for themselves.

Adam Smith would probably not say the 'invisible hand' of economics is duty (although he might call it a self-duty). He would probably call it a 'will', and from his perspective a visible-hand approach negates the will of the individual. But will and duty are closely related.

Our duties are the things which we want the most dearly. Although they may be subtle, although we may neglect them -we derive our duty to treat people well because we see how strongly we want to be treated well. This is the golden (and invisible rule).

In my opinion, the whole problem with the direction of America -flashy Hollywood, systematic professors, and pro-structure politicians- is that they want to directly control people instead of letting them make their own choices.

The US Constitution lets people vote in secret, and it emphasizes this secret duty. In the same way the Bible calls people to make a decision about the One who stands at the door knocking. These invisible choices are the ones that matter the most.

2 Comments:

Blogger Lady Lavender said...

Mostly, I think it boils down to whether or not people believe in God. I know that what ever I do, God sees and I care about what He thinks of me. To someone who believes there is no God there is no one watching and if it serves his personal desire there really is no reason not to do what feels good. This leaves room for big brother to step in and take the place of conscience. As Daniel Webster said, "People will either be ruled by the Bible or the bayonet." We seem to be headed toward an era of bayonet rule. Big government seems to be what many people want right now. However, I think a good deal of those people are too under-educated to know what they have voted for. I think there are far too many Americans who don't know the difference between socialism and capitalism and what they don't know may end up costing all of us our freedom.

LL

November 14, 2008 7:27 PM  
Blogger Matthew Canonicus said...

I agree. The Webster quote is spot on. I haven't heard it before, but it resembles something Dostoyevski explored in a lot of his writings (both Crime and Punishment and Brothers).

In my way of looking at it, the problem is not knowledge. Like Jesus told the blind man in John 9 the problem is that we claim to see when we do not. We covet our neighbor and demand handouts under the pretense of 'fairness', but we really know what we are doing -and this makes us culpable.

November 15, 2008 12:05 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home